Royal Birkdale Tournament, Week 2.
Second tournament. Eighteen finished cards. The same gross, stroke-allocation, net, and hole-by-hole evidence contract.
Complete field results.
All 18 finishers stay on one board. Sort by net finish, gross score, rank movement, or displayed handicap, then open any scorecard.
Swipe table → Gross rank · Strokes · Net · 5-ft odds · Net rank · Move
| Player | Band | Displayed HCP | Gross | Gross rank | Strokes | Net | 5-ft odds | Net rank | Move |
|---|
How the 5-ft + week context is estimated
The bold value is a benchmark across seven equivalent opportunities for this score or better: starting with the per-round estimate, it applies 1 − (1 − p)^7. The secondary line preserves the one-posted-round estimate.
This is a context sensitivity, not an official SGT probability. Equivalent opportunities are not official attempts and do not estimate actual practice benefit. SGT publishes one official round; player practice volume and practice-to-scoring transfer were not observed, so they are not modeled.
Per-round model: SGT displayed HCP used as a Handicap Index proxy; Royal Birkdale Golf Club Yellow rating/slope 71.5/135; one assumed five-foot-or-shorter concession per hole; expected miss exposure from Shot Scope's 0–6-foot make rates; inverse odds from the USGA Score Frequency/Probability Table. The scorecards do not contain putt distances, so the gimme effect cannot be reconstructed exactly.
SGT event and one-round setting · USGA probability table · Shot Scope make rates · SGT handicap method
Average and median score by hole.
Each row keeps the Yellow-tee setup, official hole handicap, sample size, average, and median together. Filters change the player group, not the course data.
Swipe table → Hole HCP · n · Average · Median
Did the strokes even it out — and which holes bit?
Two reads the field board can't show at a glance: whether higher displayed handicaps beat par by more on net, and the gross-versus-net difficulty of all 18 holes. Tap either chart to open a readable version with its full backing table.
Net result vs. displayed handicap
every player · lower = better · dashed line = played to handicapHow to read: a dot's height is one round's net result versus a handicap target — variance-heavy, not a measure of skill or a fairness verdict. Read the overall shape (is the cloud tilted or flat?), not any single dot.
Which holes bit — ranked
hardest → easiest this week · bar = gross vs par · tick = netHole difficulty by handicap band
net-to-par by band across all 18 holes · green beat par · rust over · signal, not verdictHow to read: green cells are holes a band beat on net, rust cells are holes it played over; deeper colour is a larger average gap. With four to six players per band, one hole swings a cell — read the row, not a single square.
What kind of rounds produced these scores?
Two more reads on the same 18 cards: the mix of birdies, pars, bogeys, and blow-ups behind each total, and how steady or streaky each round was hole to hole. Both describe this one event, not a player's settled game. Tap either chart for a readable version with its backing table.
Birdie+ · par · bogey · double+
each row sums to 18 holesHole-to-hole scoring swing
steadiest → streakiest · lower = steadier · within-round onlyGross and net rank movement.
Gross score, allocated strokes, and net score remain separate so the posted leaderboard can be checked row by row.
Swipe table → Gross rank · Strokes · Net · 5-ft odds · Net rank · Move
How the 5-ft + week context is estimated
The bold value is the benchmark across seven equivalent opportunities; the secondary line preserves the per-round estimate. The week benchmark applies 1 − (1 − p)^7.
Equivalent opportunities are not official attempts and do not estimate actual practice benefit. SGT publishes one official round; player practice volume and practice-to-scoring transfer were not observed.
The per-round sensitivity uses Royal Birkdale Golf Club 71.5/135, one assumed concession per hole, Shot Scope 0–6-foot make rates, and the USGA score-frequency table. It is directional, not adjudicative.
Net scoring rewrote the gross board.
Each line ties one player's gross rank to their net finish. Where lines cross, allocated strokes reshuffled the order; the tie-inclusive top third and the net winner carry the heaviest weight. Tap the chart for a readable version with its backing table.